SONG SHOPPING CENTER|
McClure & Trowbridge Publishing
P.O. Box 70403 Nashville USA 37207-0403
BMI Publisher - Harry Fox Agency (NMPA) Publisher Principal - NARAS
[12 February 2001]
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE (McClure & Trowbridge Publishing)
Trowbridge Publishing News Archives - http://TrowbridgePlanetEarth.com/T2/T2C1/T2C1Cat.html
Napster Appeals Court Decision - "What People Are Missing"
[McClure & Trowbridge Publishing; 02/12/01]
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Napster Inc. must
halt the sharing of copyrighted recordings
by millions of music lovers who swap songs
through its free Internet-based service, a
federal appeals court ruled Monday.
In a ruling that Napster officials said could
force the file-swapping clearinghouse to
shut down, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals said Napster must lock out those users who exchange
copyrighted songs without permission.
The digital music technology Napster made popular is here to stay
either way. The recording industry appears stymied by the notion of
funneling music to consumers via the Internet for a price while freely
available computer applications allow even the computer novice to do it
Napster can stay in business until U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel
retools her injunction, which the appellate court called overly broad. In
fact, even after the panel's decision, thousands of Napster users were
still trading music files on just one of the company's more than 100
Most people are still failing to compare the Napster court issues to
the cassette duplication battles of the 1970's when RIAA feared loss
of revenue by private copying and sharing of music in cassette format.
The digital format today is in a similar position to cassettes two and
three decades ago; mp3 and CD (burning) are formats for music storage and sharing widely available to individuals. The solution with cassettes was to demand tariff from cassette recorder manufacturers on sales; these monies are distributed to licensing agencies and RIAA, offsetting copy income losses.
Today's battles over mp3 copying are analogous in every respect, except scope. Then it was cassette tape and recorders; now it's mp3 format and CD burners. The solution is tariffs on mp3 player manufacturers and tariffs on CD and CD burner manufacturers.
What People Are Missing:
1.) We can't stop people from sharing sound and video files, any more than we could stop people from cassette taping a favorite record and giving it to a friend twenty five years ago. (It's not a violation of U.S.Copyright Law to make a personal copy of a copyrighted work.) A dozen mp3 and MPEG share sites pop up for every one restricted or shut down. (Gnutella, Scour, Freenet, ...)
2.) Record sales are up since the advent of Napster, Scour, and free online file sharing networks.
3.) Since record sales are up and airplay is consistent, songwriters and publishers and artists and record labels still make as much or more money than without file sharing.
In fact, now Internet webcast stations are paying royalties to the PROs (Performing Rights Organizations, like BMI or ASCAP, who collect airplay and performance royalties and distribute them to writers and publishers) so writers and publishers are actually making more money than before.
4.) People will not pay for what they can get free.
5.) People will pay a reasonable subscription price for on-demand immediate movies and music. They will not pay a subscription fee for movies and music three months or six months after release in theatres and stores.
6.) What is necessary is some creative thinking to devise new ways of making money in the evolving landscape of the Internet, technology, and the entertainment industry. Business has always been creative (look at Luis Rukeyser) - what's wrong with a little now?
7.) The fundamentally unfair and inequitable policies of the RIAA, PRO's, HFA, and MPAA continue. These inequities in distribution and collection of royalties are not at issue in the current Napster court cases.
8.) THE REAL issue is that RIAA, PRO's, HFA, and MPAA are grabbing huge chunks of the Internet earnings landscape and saying "Try to take it back away from us." Their tactic is to grab everything first, then defend it. They are acting out of fear in the face of a revolutionary technology. They are not acting out of right or good will.
Courtney Love's "Digital Hollywood" Speech
Show Your Support - Trowbridge Songwriter Earnings & Internet Music
Show Your Support - Napster
[McClure & Trowbridge Publishing; 02/12/01]
& Trowbridge: Leading the way in the 21'st
All Rights Reserved
©2001-present Trowbridge Publishing PID:NapsterRights
Last Updated 02/12/01